Apr 16 2009

Anyone still there?

Published under Off Topic

Been busy with real life stuff for the last few months. So I had to cut out the time sinks, which blogging definitely is. Time should be freeing up in the near future, so I’m going to try to get back to writing. We’ll see how it goes. In the meantime, is anyone still subscribed to this feed?

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (No Ratings Yet)
Loading ... Loading ...

Related Posts:

  • No related posts

    • 20 Responses to “Anyone still there?”

    1. # Duae Quartunciaeon 16 Apr 2009 at 10:50 pm

      Yes…. although no obligation is conferred.

    2. # Jari Worsleyon 17 Apr 2009 at 4:12 am

      Yes still here. Still subscribed in google reader.

      If time commitment is too high, then turn it into a “slow blog” i.e. just post infrequently. Anyone subscribed will still pick it up.

    3. # Craigon 17 Apr 2009 at 5:15 am

      Here.

    4. # Robert Grumbineon 17 Apr 2009 at 5:42 am

      Still here. Was wondering if you’d been interrupted by real life, or were giving up on blogging.

      Welcome back to the unreal world.

    5. # NUon 17 Apr 2009 at 6:23 am

      I’m subscribed.

    6. # Don Fontaineon 17 Apr 2009 at 8:49 am

      still here, but infrequent.

    7. # thingsbreakon 17 Apr 2009 at 11:02 am

      Not subscribed, but still check in.

    8. # juleson 17 Apr 2009 at 12:02 pm

      welcome back.

      i guess most people have readers, so the frequency of blogging doesn’t matter imho

    9. # Pipon 17 Apr 2009 at 4:43 pm

      Here.

    10. # AlBon 17 Apr 2009 at 11:27 pm

      Here - RSS makes it easy

    11. # Ianon 18 Apr 2009 at 9:16 pm

      Good to see you back. I’m not subscribed to your feed, but I check in often enough to wonder where you went. :)

    12. # Ryanon 18 Apr 2009 at 9:32 pm

      I’ve been wondering where you’ve been.

    13. # Anna Hayneson 19 Apr 2009 at 12:14 pm

      > i guess most people have readers

      well, not everyone. But I’ve got you on Warming101.com, so you showed right up.

      Aggregators are definitely the way to go - daily blogging is just too hard to keep up.

      (welcome back!)

      Anna

    14. # William Connolleyon 19 Apr 2009 at 1:39 pm

      No, I’m not listening :-)

      Are you *sure* you’ve been too busy for trivia recently?

    15. # Atmozon 19 Apr 2009 at 3:43 pm

      Blogging takes more time that WP. At least for me, since I actually try to think about what I write here. WP… not so much. :-o

    16. # Anders Eon 20 Apr 2009 at 1:52 pm

      Subscribed. And have been wondering.

    17. # Peter Hon 21 Apr 2009 at 1:06 pm

      Good to see you back, I had nearly stopped checking…

      Btw, is there something amis with the Wiki Greenhouse effect page with content from another page inserted between ref 22 and 23?

    18. # Atmozon 21 Apr 2009 at 3:59 pm

      Fixed. Thanks. The reason for those interested is that someone had transcluded a reference using the {{cite doi}} template that had been edited to include content. A good reason not to use that silly system IMO.

    19. # Saraon 22 Apr 2009 at 4:21 pm

      Yes, and please cover the effects on ecosystems, plant and animal life (including humans) that these aerosol spraying programs have.

    20. # KCon 05 May 2009 at 8:59 am

      Slow to notice, but still here.

    Trackback URI |

    To reduce spam, comments are automatically closed 30 days after the last comment. If you would like to comment on any closed thread, please use the contact form at the top of this page.