Apr 11 2007
How the Internet Makes Good People Bad
The internet and the decline of academic honesty is a one post blog written by a supposed concerned professor. In it, she argues that the Internet has fundamentally changed higher education; that the widespread “borrowing” of information has increased to a point that over half of all students should be caught for some sort of academic cheating.
Washington Post editor Jason Johnson says that Cut-and-Paste Is a Skill, Too. He admits to plaugiarizing on the day he wrote the article, and says that he was rewarded for it. I wonder if he told the intellectual property lawyers employed by the paper. They know about it now though, so either they don’t care or he was telling a little white lie to make a point. I hope it’s the latter, but wouldn’t bet the farm on it.
Dave Munger of Cognitive daily picks up the story and asks, Should we ban term papers and embrace plagiarism?. Since I’m in the middle of grading term papers right now, the answer to a shortened question, “should we ban term papers?” is a resounding “YES!” I hate them. I hate doing them; I hate grading them. In my opinion, they’re pointless. However, we should never embrace plagiarism. If the point of education is the accumulation and production of knowledge, then cut-and-paste has no place. If education is only a means to an end, then paste away. I think today that a college-level education has become seen almost as a 13th grade (in the US educational system). What does someone do after high school? They go to college of course. Why? Because that’s just what’s done. Add to it that more jobs are requiring a college education, not for any good reason either. College is seen as something that needs to be done in order to get a good job. And that’s a pity.
College should be a place to learn about subjects that interest the student. They shouldn’t be forced to take any class that they don’t want to take. I suspect that if it wasn’t required, the course I TA would have very few or maybe even no students in it. Of course, I recognize the need to have required courses. But couldn’t all incoming first-year students be required to take an English composition class? And maybe an educational ethics class? Then when someone gets caught blatently plagiarizing, we could kick them out of school easily. Cut down on the paperwork so it isn’t a chore for the instructor. As it stands now, I agree with the concerned professor - over half of all students will plagiarize on a given assignment. And that’s sad. It’s sad that students don’t see value in doing their own work, and it’s sad that professors don’t do anything about it. But just imagine of all cheaters were expelled, wouldn’t that leave only those that should have got into college in the first place? I would argue it does. By removing the lower cruft of students, it will increase the value of the degree for those that complete it. College will cease to be thought of as a 13th grade and that’s a good thing.
I know universities will never expel 50% of their students. It seems that the mantra is “the more students the better”. Since I did my undergraduate work at a small liberal arts college, I know this isn’t the case. My largest class, an introductory chemistry class needed to graduate, had about 50 students. My largest class in my major my senior year had 8. Bigger isn’t better. Last semester I was a TA for a class of 150. Even as a TA, I had no hope of actually knowing how much a student has learned in the class - except relying on multiple choice exams, which I don’t think accurately measure the amount of learned knowlege (though that’s another subject entirely).
So what is the solution? Students seem not to care that they are cheating. Instructors don’t seem to want to bother reporting these cases. And the administration doesn’t want to lose half its student population every semester. The simple answer is to just fail the students in that class and make them take it over again. However, it seems that this doesn’t pose that great of a problem to a large percentage of students. A better way is needed to assess student knowledge while simultaneously teaching them that cheating will not be tolerated.
The solution has to embrace the Internet; it’s not going anywhere and students will continue to use it as a resource - good or bad. I don’t think services that check for plagiarism are the answer. That is a reactive solution. What is needed is a proactive solution that teaches students that plagiarism is not okay, and it’s necessary to do your own work - even when you get out of college and have to do real work. I don’t have the answer, but it needs to be answered soon.
